Resection of cervical spinal neurinoma including affected nerve root Recovery of neurological deficit in 15 cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809000930Abstract
In surgery for spinal neurinoma derived from a root, which is assumed to be important for function of the extremities, it is controversial whether the nerve root involved should be totally resected. We retrospectively reviewed the postoperative neurological deficits in 15 patients with solitary neurinoma or neurofibroma in a segment of the cervical spine (C5-C8); in all of them, both anterior and posterior roots were resected. Mean patient age was 47 (18–71) years and the mean follow-up period was 49 (9–137) months. 10 patients showed loss of motor function and 8 patients developed sensory impairment postoperatively. Most postoperative loss of motor function was recovered.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1998-01-01
How to Cite
Miura, T., Nakamura, K., Tanaka, H., Kawaguchi, H., Takeshita, K., & Kurokawa, T. (1998). Resection of cervical spinal neurinoma including affected nerve root Recovery of neurological deficit in 15 cases. Acta Orthopaedica, 69(3), 280–282. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809000930
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
