Ultrasound measurements of the newborn hip Comparison of two methods in 657 newborns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809002349Abstract
We compared ultrasound measurements using the Graf and Terjesen methods in 657 newborns. the alpha angle and femoral head coverage (FHC) were analyzed. the rate of DDH was 3.9%, according to Graf and 2.9%, according to Terjesen. the spontaneous increases in alpha angle and FHC were 5° and 7%, respectively, during the first 2 months. Good accordance between the two methods was shown. A few hips were normal, according to one method and were subluxated, according to the other one. the methods gave similar results, except the percentage of “immature hips” Ha (29%) and “possible dysplas-tic hips” (14%). This might be a sign of better specificity of the Terjesen method. Good interobserver agreement and simple classification favor use of the Terjesen method. the method of Graf is the most commonly used and gives adequate evaluation of the hip, if the method of examination and rather complicated classification are followed closely.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1998-01-01
How to Cite
Czubak, J., Kotwicki, T., Piontek, T., & Skrzypek, H. (1998). Ultrasound measurements of the newborn hip Comparison of two methods in 657 newborns. Acta Orthopaedica, 69(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809002349
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.
