The different strategies in treating displaced femoral neck fractures: mid-term surgical outcome in a register-based cohort of 1,283 patients aged 60–69 years

Authors

  • Johan Lagergren Western Hospital Group, Alingsås; Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-0733
  • Sebastian Strøm Rönnquist Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden and Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0762-9691
  • Olof Wolf Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Swedish Fracture Register, Gothenburg, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6668-8715
  • Sebastian Mukka Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Orthopedics), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5469-2730
  • Michael Möller Swedish Fracture Register, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg/ Mölndal, Sweden; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-6057
  • Jonatan Nåtman Swedish Fracture Register, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg/ Mölndal, Sweden
  • Cecilia Rogmark Swedish Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Orthopaedics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6556-4320

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.20284

Keywords:

Arthroplasty, Femoral neck fracture, Fractures, Hip

Abstract

Background and purpose: In patients around retirement age controversy exists as to whether to treat displaced femoral neck fracture (dFNF) with internal fixation (IF) or arthroplasty. An arthroplasty in this age group may need revision due to a long expected remaining lifetime. IF carries a higher risk of early failure but a maintained native hip if healing occurs. We aimed to determine the cumulative 5-year rate of conversion to arthroplasty after IF and implant revision after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), respectively.
Patients and methods: In this longitudinal cohort study, patients aged 60–69 years registered with a dFNF in the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) 2012–2018 were cross-referenced with available data from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register (SAR) until December 31, 2019. Conversion to arthroplasty or revision were analyzed utilizing competing risk, with death as competing event.
Results: At 5 years, the cumulative rate of conversion to arthroplasty after IF was 31% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26–37). For primary THA, the 5-year rate of revision was 4.0% (CI 2.8–5.8). The 5-year mortality did not differ, being 20% (CI 16–27) and 23% (CI 20–28) after IF and THA, respectively. Regression analyses did not identify any risk factors for conversion arthroplasty based on the variables in the register.
Conclusion: A follow-up of 5 years catches most reoperations after IF, resulting in a 31% conversion rate. The 4% revision rate at 5 years after primary THA should be seen as an intermediate result, as late complications may occur.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ftouh S, Morga A, Swift C, Guideline Development Group. Management of hip fracture in adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2011; 342: d3304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3304

Al-Ani A N, Neander G, Samuelsson B, Blomfeldt R, Ekstrom W, Hedstrom M. Risk factors for osteoporosis are common in young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures regardless of trauma mechanism. Acta Orthop 2013; 84(1): 54-9. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.765639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.765639

Bartels S, Gjertsen J E, Frihagen F, Rogmark C, Utvag S E. High failure rate after internal fixation and beneficial outcome after arthroplasty in treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients between 55 and 70 years. Acta Orthop 2017: 1-6. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1376514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1376514

Nyholm A M, Palm H, Sandholdt H, Troelsen A, Gromov K, DFDB Collaborators. Risk of reoperation within 12 months following osteosynthesis of a displaced femoral neck fracture is linked mainly to initial fracture displacement while risk of death may be linked to bone quality: a cohort study from Danish Fracture Database. Acta Orthop 2020; 91(1): 1-75. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1698503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1698503

Swedish Fracture Register Annual Report 2022 (in Swedish). Available from: https://registercentrum.blob.core.windows.net/sfr/r/-rsrapport-SFR-2022-By_ps8PU3.pdf.

Mahmoud S S, Pearse E O, Smith T O, Hing C B. Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty, as a salvage procedure, following failed internal fixation of intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B(4): 452-60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.36922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.36922

Blomfeldt R, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S, Soderqvist A, Tidermark J. Displaced femoral neck fracture: comparison of primary total hip replacement with secondary replacement after failed internal fixation: a 2-year follow-up of 84 patients. Acta Orthop 2006; 77(4): 638-43. doi: 10.1080/17453670610012728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610012728

Le Manach Y, Collins G, Bhandari M, Bessissow A, Boddaert J, Khiami F, et al. Outcomes after hip fracture surgery compared with elective total hip replacement. JAMA 2015; 314(11): 1159-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10842

Qin C D, Helfrich M M, Fitz D W, Hardt K D, Beal M D, Manning D W. The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Differences in postoperative outcomes between total hip arthroplasty for fracture vs osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32(9S): S3-S7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.049

Nugent M, Young S W, Frampton C M, Hooper G J. The lifetime risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B(3): 479-85. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B3.BJJ-2020-0562.R2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B3.BJJ-2020-0562.R2

Lagergren J, Möller M, Rogmark C. Displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 60–69 years old: treatment and patient reported outcomes in a register cohort. Injury 2020; 51(11): 2652-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.004

Chammout G K, Mukka S S, Carlsson T, Neander G F, Stark A W, Skoldenberg O G. Total hip replacement versus open reduction and internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94(21): 1921-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01615

Johansson T. Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures: a minimum fifteen-year follow-up study of a previously reported randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96(6): e46. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00244

Leonardsson O, Sernbo I, Carlsson A, Akesson K, Rogmark C. Long-term follow-up of replacement compared with internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures: results at ten years in a randomised study of 450 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(3): 406-12. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23036

von Elm E, Altman D G, Egger M, Pocock S J, Gotzsche P C, Vandenbroucke J P, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370(9596): 1453-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X

Moller M, Wolf O, Bergdahl C, Mukka S, Rydberg E M, Hailer N P, et al. The Swedish Fracture Register: ten years of experience and 600,000 fractures collected in a National Quality Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23(1): 141. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05062-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05062-w

Bergdahl C, Nilsson F, Wennergren D, Ekholm C, Moller M. Completeness in the Swedish Fracture Register and the Swedish National Patient Register: an assessment of humeral fracture registrations. Clin Epidemiol 2021; 13: 325-33. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S307762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S307762

Marsh J L, Slongo T F, Agel J, Broderick J S, Creevey W, DeCoster T A, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21(10 Suppl.): S1-133. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001

W-Dahl A, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Nauclér E, Nåtman J, Bülow E, et al. The Swedish Arthroplasty Register: Annual report 2021. doi: 10.18158/SyZ333H5F. Available from: https://registercentrum.blob.core.windows.net/slr/r/SAR-Annual-Report-2021-SJlAFmlRl5.pdf.

Bartels S, Kristensen T B, Gjertsen J E, Frihagen F, Rogmark C, Dolatowski F C, et al. Total hip arthroplasty leads to better results after low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture in patients aged 55 to 70 years: a randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing internal fixation and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104(15): 1341-51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.01411

Keating J F, Grant A, Masson M, Scott N W, Forbes J F. Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty: treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(2): 249-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00215

Hauer G, Heri A, Klim S, Puchwein P, Leithner A, Sadoghi P. Survival rate and application number of total hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture: an analysis of clinical studies and national arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35(4): 1014-22. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.033

McKinley J C, Robinson C M. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures with total hip arthroplasty: comparison of primary arthroplasty with early salvage arthroplasty after failed internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84(11): 2010-15. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200211000-00016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200211000-00016

van Leent E A P, Schmitz P P, de Jong L D, Zuurmond R G, Vos C J, van Susante J L C, et al. Complications and survival of conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed primary osteosynthesis compared to primary total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures. Injury 2022; 53(8): 2853-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.033

Leonardsson O, Rogmark C, Kärrholm J, Åkesson K, Garellick G. Outcome after primary and secondary replacement for subcapital fracture of the hip in 10 264 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(5): 595-600. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.22224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.22224

Schmitz P P, Hannink G, Somford M P, Schreurs B W, Van Susante J L C. Revision risk of salvage compared with acute total hip arthroplasty following femoral neck fracture: an analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2023; 94:399-403. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.17743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.17743

Hansson S, Bulow E, Garland A, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C. More hip complications after total hip arthroplasty than after hemi-arthroplasty as hip fracture treatment: analysis of 5,815 matched pairs in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2020; 91(2): 133-8. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1690339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1690339

Published

2023-10-10

How to Cite

Lagergren, J., Strøm Rönnquist, S., Wolf, O., Mukka, S., Möller, M., Nåtman, J., & Rogmark, C. (2023). The different strategies in treating displaced femoral neck fractures: mid-term surgical outcome in a register-based cohort of 1,283 patients aged 60–69 years. Acta Orthopaedica, 94, 505–510. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.20284