The reliability of the American Knee Society Score
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317362244Abstract
We have investigated the reliability of the American Knee Society Score (AKS), a widely used functional outcome score for knee arthroplasty. 29 subjects were assessed in random order by 6 observers, each patient seen twice by each observer.The interobserver reference intervals were 16 points for the Knee Score (0-100 points) and 21 points for the Function Score (0-100 points). The intraobserver reference intervals were smaller, 11 points and 13 points for the Knee Score and the Function Score, respectively. The presence of arthritis in other joints and general debility did not affect the reliability of the scores. The more experienced observers had greater intraobserver reproducibility. Notably, we found moderate agreement between observers in the subjective variables, while the objective variables produced lower levels of agreement. The high inter- and intraobserver variations of the AKS makes estimation of score change questionable. Reliable use of the AKS would necessitate repeated evaluation by an experienced observer.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2000-01-01
How to Cite
Liow, R. Y. L., Walker, K., Wajid, M. A., Bedi, G., & Lennox, C. M. E. (2000). The reliability of the American Knee Society Score. Acta Orthopaedica, 71(6), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317362244
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
