Displaced tibial shaft fractures: A prospective randomized study of closed intramedullary nailing versus cast treatment in 53 patients

Authors

  • Abbas Hallaj Karladani
  • Hans Granhed
  • Björn Edshage
  • Ragnar Jerre
  • Jorma Styf

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317413139

Abstract

Of 53 patients with unilateral, displaced and closed or grade 1 open tibial shaft fractures, 27 patients (group I) were randomized to treatment with an intramedullary nail and 26 patients (group II) to treatment with a plaster cast. 12 fractures in the latter group were considered stable enough for treatment with only a cast (group IIa), while 14 fractures in group II showed redisplacement during reduction under anesthesia or at 1 week follow-up. Therefore, these fractures were stabilized with cerclage or screws (group IIb), which was a prerequisite for continuing cast treatment. The mean time-to-union was 19 weeks for group I, and 25 weeks for group II. 6 patients in group I and 16 in group II had delayed union. The Nottingham Health Profile index scores on physical mobility, social isolation, work ability, and sexual life were significantly better in group I than in group II at 3 months after injury. Delayed union, malunion, and restricted range of motion at the ankle joint were common complications when these fractures were treated with a cast. We recommend intramedullary nailing for these fractures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2000-01-01

How to Cite

Karladani, A. H., Granhed, H., Edshage, B., Jerre, R., & Styf, J. (2000). Displaced tibial shaft fractures: A prospective randomized study of closed intramedullary nailing versus cast treatment in 53 patients. Acta Orthopaedica, 71(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317413139

PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.