Proprioception after total knee arthroplasty: A comparison with clinical outcome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317413120Abstract
We determined proprioception in replaced and unreplaced arthrotic knees by measuring threshold levels for the perception of passive knee motion. In addition, results of these proprioception measurements were compared with the clinical outcomes in patients with a total knee arthroplasty. Threshold detection levels were significantly higher in the replaced than in the unreplaced knees. Moreover, detection-failure rates were significantly higher in the replaced knees as well. In contrast to this diminished movement sense in the replaced knees, clinical examination of these knees showed good or excellent outcome in all cases. A correlation between the clinical outcome and the ability to perceive passive motion in either patient group could not be found. We hypothesize that our findings may be due to the operative removal of intraarticular receptor-rich tissue that is affected by arthrosis. This would not only contribute to marked clinical improvements but also to a significant decrease in proprioception.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2000-01-01
How to Cite
Pap, G., Meyer, M., Weiler, H.-T., MacHner, A., & Awiszus, F. (2000). Proprioception after total knee arthroplasty: A comparison with clinical outcome. Acta Orthopaedica, 71(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317413120
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.
