Charnley cups retained during revision of the femoral component: Repeated clinical and radiographic observations of 49 cups for 7-15 years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/000164701753532772Abstract
This article concerns 49 consecutive polyethylene cups retained in cemented first revisions of the femoral component and evaluated on several occasions 7-15 years after the index operation. At the last follow-up 5 cups were revised, 3 were radiographically loose, 1 was revised because of recurrent dislocation and 1 stable cup was revised because the surgeon wished to use a 28 mm head. Moreover, 1 unrevised cup was radiographically loose. This corresponded to a mechanical failure rate of 0.1 (5/49) and revision rate of 0.1 (4/49). 3 cups which were radiographically loose (100% radiolucency) had not been revised when the stem was exchanged. If these cups were excluded, the revision rate would have dropped to 0.02 (1/46) and the mechanical failure rate to 0.04 (2/46). This indicates the importance of careful preoperative radiographic evaluation on both AP and lateral views. Progression of radiolucent lines always occurred as an increase in extension from the periphery to the central region of the interface. In conclusion, Charnley cups with non-circumferential radiolucent lines and little, if any, wear can be retained without compromising the longevity of the implant. However, it should be stressed that this conclusion is based on a patient population in which four-fifths of the patients at the index operation were 65 years of age or older.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2001-01-01
How to Cite
Hultmark, P., Kärrholm, J., Strömberg, C., Granhed, H., & Herberts, P. (2001). Charnley cups retained during revision of the femoral component: Repeated clinical and radiographic observations of 49 cups for 7-15 years. Acta Orthopaedica, 72(5), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164701753532772
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
