Simple end-to-end suture versus augmented repair in acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A retrospective comparison in 98 patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310013978Abstract
We retrospectively compared the results in 98 patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with an augmented tendon repair (n = 59) to patients with an end-to-end suture (n = 39) after an average follow-up of 44 (22-69) months. 7 patients were operated on more than 2 weeks after the rupture, all with augmention. The complication rates in the augmention group were 0.1 and in the end-to-end suture group 0.2. We found no differences in subjective outcome or rerupture rate between the groups. In the augmentation group, the rate of complications was higher in those operated on after 2 weeks than in those operated on before. A simple end-to-end suture seems sufficient.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2003-01-01
How to Cite
Nyyssönen, T., Saarikoski, H., Kaukonen, J.-P., Lüthje, P., & Hakovirta, H. (2003). Simple end-to-end suture versus augmented repair in acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A retrospective comparison in 98 patients. Acta Orthopaedica, 74(2), 206–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310013978
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
