Femoral cement pressurization in hip arthroplastyA laboratory comparison of three techniques

Authors

  • Birender Kapoor
  • Sandeep Datir
  • Benjamin Davis
  • Charles Wynn-Jones
  • Nicola Maffulli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410004076

Abstract

Background Several cementing techniques are used for the proximal femur.Material and methods We evaluated 3 femoral cement pressurization techniques (standard, pressurizer in situ, and thumb pressurization) in 12 plastic femurs, with 4 sets of observations for each technique. Intramedullary pressure readings were obtained using proximal and distal pressure monitoring transducers. The peak pressure and the length of time for which the pressure was above a particular cutoff level (5 KPa and 100 KPa) were compared for the different techniques.Results We found significant differences between the 3 cementing techniques in the peak pressure and the length of time for which the pressure was above 100 KPa. The pressurizer in situ technique gave higher peak pressure (p 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2004-01-01

How to Cite

Kapoor, B., Datir, S., Davis, B., Wynn-Jones, C., & Maffulli, N. (2004). Femoral cement pressurization in hip arthroplastyA laboratory comparison of three techniques. Acta Orthopaedica, 75(6), 708–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410004076