Femoral cement pressurization in hip arthroplastyA laboratory comparison of three techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410004076Abstract
Background Several cementing techniques are used for the proximal femur.Material and methods We evaluated 3 femoral cement pressurization techniques (standard, pressurizer in situ, and thumb pressurization) in 12 plastic femurs, with 4 sets of observations for each technique. Intramedullary pressure readings were obtained using proximal and distal pressure monitoring transducers. The peak pressure and the length of time for which the pressure was above a particular cutoff level (5 KPa and 100 KPa) were compared for the different techniques.Results We found significant differences between the 3 cementing techniques in the peak pressure and the length of time for which the pressure was above 100 KPa. The pressurizer in situ technique gave higher peak pressure (pDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2004-01-01
How to Cite
Kapoor, B., Datir, S., Davis, B., Wynn-Jones, C., & Maffulli, N. (2004). Femoral cement pressurization in hip arthroplastyA laboratory comparison of three techniques. Acta Orthopaedica, 75(6), 708–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410004076
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
