No benefits with computer assistance in triple pelvic osteotomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001187Abstract
We evaluated computer-assisted surgery (CAS) used for 21 triple pelvic osteotomies on 20 patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and compared the intraoperative and immediate postoperative data with those of 32 patients who underwent 40 pelvic osteotomies without CAS. The use of the CAS system was abandoned during 9/21 operations mostly because of technical and CT data failure. The preoperative blood loss and duration of surgery were greater, while neurovascular damage occurred less often in the CAS group. We found that the CAS system for pelvic osteotomy was not better than conventional methods.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2004-01-01
How to Cite
Pakvis, D., van Hellemondt, G., Anderson, P., & de Kleuver, M. (2004). No benefits with computer assistance in triple pelvic osteotomy. Acta Orthopaedica, 75(3), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001187
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
