The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: A cadaver model with simulated blood flow
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610012683Abstract
Background Limited data exist on the performance of low-viscosity cement in clinically realistic cadaver models. Methods Paired stem/cement/femur constructs were generated with low-viscosity and standard-viscosity cements. The constructs were created and tested under simulated in vivo conditions, for which novel techniques were developed during this study. Mantle function was quantified by stem/cortex micromotions over 105cycles of “stair-climbing”. Mantle morphology was determined from transverse sections. Results Penetration of low-viscosity cement was greater proximally but less distally (p = 0.02). Low-viscosity cement resulted in more stem retroversion (p = 0.04), but there was no difference in subsidence (p = 0.4). Low-viscosity cement mantles had greater fractions of non-apposed interface (p = 0.006). Fraction of non-apposed interface predicted stem retroversion (R2 = 0.64, p = 0.002). Interpretation Low-viscosity cement resulted in inferior cement mantles. Early micromotion was reduced by better interface apposition. The greater stem retroversion of low-viscosity cement would probably lead to higher revision rates. Early stem migration is due to interface non-apposition. Techniques should be developed to reduce non-apposition of cemented interfaces.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2006-01-01
How to Cite
Race, A., Miller, M. A., Clarke, M. T., Mann, K. A., & Higham, P. A. (2006). The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: A cadaver model with simulated blood flow. Acta Orthopaedica, 77(4), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610012683
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
