Press-fit stability of an osteochondral autograft: Influence of different plug length and perfect depth alignment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610046352Abstract
Background Osteochondral autologous transplantation is used for the treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage lesions of a joint. Press-fit stability is an important factor for good survival of the transplanted plugs. Material and methods 36 plugs of three different lengths were transplanted in fresh-frozen human knees. On one condyle, 3 plugs were exactly matched to the depth of the recipient site (“bottomed” plugs) and on the opposite condyle 3 plugs were 5 mm shorter than the depth of the recipient site (“unbottomed” plugs). Plugs were left protruding and then pushed in until flush, and then to 2 mm below flush level, using a loading apparatus. Results Longer plugs needed higher forces to begin displacement. At flush level, bottomed plugs needed significantly higher forces than unbottomed plugs to become displaced below flush level (mean forces of 404 N and 131 N, respectively). Shorter bottomed plugs required higher forces than longer bottomed ones. Interpretation Bottomed plugs generally provide much more stability than unbottomed ones. Short bottomed plugs are more stable than long bottomed plugs. Thus, in clinical practice it is advisable to use short bottomed plugs. If, however, unbottomed plugs are still chosen, the longer the plug the higher the resulting stability will be because of higher frictional forces.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2006-01-01
How to Cite
Kock, N. B., Van Susante, J. L. C., Buma, P., Van Kampen, A., & Verdonschot, N. (2006). Press-fit stability of an osteochondral autograft: Influence of different plug length and perfect depth alignment. Acta Orthopaedica, 77(3), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610046352
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
