SF-36 scores in degenerative lumbar spine disorders: Analysis of prospective data from 451 patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610046064Abstract
Background When using Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in assessing outcomes of treatment, normative data for different diagnoses are needed to allow cross-comparisons of existing and future studies. We determined the SF-36 scores in patients with surgical lumbar spine problems. Methods This is a prospective observational study of consecutive surgical patients in one institution. In addition to SF-36 questionnaire responses, local pain, radiating pain, analgesic intake and walking ability were recorded, together with several other demographic variables. 451 patients (50% women) with median age 52 (13–88) years, operated from 1998 through 2002, were included in the study. Results Preoperative SF-36 scores were significantly lower than those derived from previously published material (the general population, nonspecific low back pain (LBP) patients, other samples of non-LBP patients), also with the use of normbased scoring. Sick-leave and worker's compensation seemed to affect perceived Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), but smoking habits did not. Some SF-36 domains showed a possible discriminating pattern between diagnoses. Interpretation HRQoL reported by patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery was much worse than for the normal population and for LBP patients. The normative SF-36 values provided may be used as a benchmark in future studies.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2006-01-01
How to Cite
Zanoli, G., Jönsson, B., & Strömqvist, B. (2006). SF-36 scores in degenerative lumbar spine disorders: Analysis of prospective data from 451 patients. Acta Orthopaedica, 77(2), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610046064
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
