In vitro comparison of the effects of rough and polished stem surface finish on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453670902876755Abstract
Background and purpose High pressures around implants can cause bone lysis and loosening. We investigated how pressures are generated around cemented femoral stems. Method We compared the pressures generated by rough and polished tapered stems at their cement interfaces, in an in vitro model, before and after 1 million load cycles. Results At the start of the study, the loading of both polished and rough stems generated interface pressures that were not statistically significantly different. After 1 million load cycles, the rough stems generated greater interface pressures than at the start (p = 0.03), with maximum pressure wave amplitudes of 450,000 Pa or 3,375 mm Hg. The pressures generated by polished stems were similar before and after 1 million load cycles, and were lower than the pressures generated by the rough stems (p = 0.01). Stem loading caused micromotion between the stem and cement. Polished stems migrated distally in the cement but retained rotational and axial stability. The rough stems also migrated distally and wore the cement mantle, leading to increased rotational instability. Interpretation The change in the rotational micromotion of the rough stem is likely to be the principal cause of the increased stem pump output and to be a key factor in the longevity of cemented femoral implants.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2009-01-01
How to Cite
Bartlett, G. E., Beard, D. J., Murray, D. W., & Gill, H. S. (2009). In vitro comparison of the effects of rough and polished stem surface finish on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica, 80(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453670902876755
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
