Does choice of bearings influence the survival of cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients aged 20–55 years? Comparison of 21,594 patients reported to the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association dataset 2005–2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.13384Keywords:
ceramic-on-ceramic, ceramic-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene, metal-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene, metal-on-metal, total hip arthroplasty, young adultAbstract
Background and purpose: The bearings with the best survivorship for young patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) should be identified. We compared hazard ratios (HR) of revision of primary stemmed cementless THAs with metal-on-metal (MoM), ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), and ceramic-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene (CoXLP) with that of metal-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene (MoXLP) bearings in patients aged 20–55 years with primary osteoarthritis or childhood hip disorders.
Patients and methods: From the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association dataset we included 1,813 MoM, 3,615 CoC, 5,947 CoXLP, and 10,219 MoXLP THA in patients operated on between 2005 and 2017 in a prospective cohort study. We used the Kaplan–Meier estimator for THA survivorship and Cox regression to estimate HR of revision adjusted for confounders (including 95% confidence intervals [CI]). MoXLP was used as reference. HRs were calculated during 3 intervals (0–2, 2–7, and 7–13 years) to meet the assumption of proportional hazards.
Results: Median follow-up was 5 years for MoXLP, 10 years for MoM, 6 years for CoC, and 4 years for CoXLP. 13-year Kaplan–Meier survival estimates were 95% (CI 94–95) for MoXLP, 82% (CI 80–84) for MoM, 93% (CI 92–95) for CoC, and 93% (CI 92–94) for CoXLP bearings. MoM had higher 2–7 and 7–13 years’ adjusted HRs of revision (3.6, CI 2.3–5.7 and 4.1, CI 1.7–10). MoXLP, CoC, and CoXLP had similar HRs in all 3 periods. The 7–13-year adjusted HRs of revision of CoC and CoXLP were statistically non-significantly higher.
Conclusion: In young patients, MoXLP for primary cementless THA had higher revision-free survival and lower HR for revision than MoM bearings. Longer follow-up is needed to compare MoXLP, CoC, and CoXLP.
Downloads
References
Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report 2021. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2021.
Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2021. Available from: danskhoftealloplastikregister.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ DHR-aarsrapport-2021_Offentliggoerelse.pdf.
National Joint Registry 17th Annual Report 2020—National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. PMID: 33439585. Available from: www.njrcentre.org.uk.
Saleh K J, Celebrezze M, Kassim R, Dykes D C, Gioe T J, Callaghan J J, et al. Functional outcome after revision hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (416): 254-64. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093006.90435.43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000093006.90435.43
Jacobs J J, Shanbhag A, Glant T T, Black J, Galante J O. Wear debris in total joint replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1994; 2(4): 212-20. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199407000-00004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-199407000-00004
Zagra L, Gallazzi E. Bearing surfaces in primary total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3(5): 217-2. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.3.180300
Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report 2012. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2012.
Varnum C, Pedersen A B, Mäkelä K, Eskelinen A, Havelin L I, Furnes O, et al. Increased risk of revision of cementless stemmed total hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(4): 491-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1023132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1023132
Matharu G S, Judge A, Eskelinen A, Murray D W, Pandit H G. What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?: a clinical update. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(1): 29-39. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1398011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1398011
Heckmann N D, Sivasundaram L, Stefl M D, Kang H P, Basler E T, Lieberman J R. Total hip arthroplasty bearing surface trends in the United States from 2007 to 2014: the rise of ceramic on polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33(6): 1757-63.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.040
Holleyman R J, Critchley R J, Mason J M, Jameson S S, Reed M R, Malviya A. Ceramic bearings are associated with a significantly reduced revision rate in primary hip arthroplasty: an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36(10): 3498-506. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.027
Davis E T, Pagkalos J, Kopjar B. Effect of bearing surface on survival of cementless and hybrid total hip arthroplasty: study of data in the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. JB JS open access 2020; 5(2): e0075. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00075
Sedrakyan A, Graves S, Bordini B, Pons M, Havelin L, Mehle S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of ceramic-on-ceramic implants in stemmed hip replacement: a multinational study of six national and regional registries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96(Suppl. 1): 34-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00465
The Nordic Council of Ministers. Formal Nordic Co-Operation. Available from: http//www.norden.org/en.
Mäkelä K T, Matilainen M, Pulkkinen P, Fenstad A M, Havelin L I, Engesaeter L, et al. Countrywise results of total hip replacement. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(2): 107-16. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.893498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.893498
Mäkelä K T, Furnes O, Hallan G, Fenstad A M, Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, et al. The benefits of collaboration: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4(6): 391-400. doi: 10.1302/20585241.4.180058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180058
Engesæter L B, Engesæter I O, Fenstad A M, Havelin L I, Kärrholm J, Garellick G, et al. Low revision rate after total hip arthroplasty in patients with pediatric hip diseases. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(5): 436-41. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.736171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.736171
Howard D P, Wall P D H, Fernandez M A, Parsons H, Howard P W. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing fractures in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99(8): 1012-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B8.BJJ-20170019.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B8.BJJ-2017-0019.R1
de Steiger R N, Hatton A, Peng Y, Graves S. What is the risk of THA revision for ARMD in patients with non-metal-on-metal bearings? A study from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478(6): 1244-53. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001277
Hoskins W, Rainbird S, Peng Y, Lorimer M, Graves S E, Bingham R. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing breakage in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36(8): 2992–7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.021
Hallan G, Fenstad A M, Furnes O. What is the frequency of fracture of ceramic components in THA? Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478(6): 1254-61. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001272
Wyles C C, Jimenez-Almonte J H, Murad M H, Norambuena-Morales G A, Cabanela M E, Sierra R J, et al. There are no differences in short- to mid-term survivorship among total hip-bearing surface options: a network meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(6): 2031-41. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4065-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4065-0
Varnum C, Pedersen A B, Kjærsgaard-Andersen P, Overgaard S. Do different types of bearings and noise from total hip arthroplasty influence hip-related pain, function, and quality of life postoperatively? Acta Orthop 2016; 87(6): 567-74. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1225649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1225649
Owen D H, Russell N C, Smith P N, Walter W L. An estimation of the incidence of squeaking and revision surgery for squeaking in ceramicon-ceramic total hip replacement: a meta-analysis and report from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B(2): 181-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32784
Cafri G, Paxton E W, Love R, Bini S A, Kurtz S M. Is there a difference in revision risk between metal and ceramic heads on highly crosslinked polyethylene liners? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475(5): 1349-55. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4966-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4966-1
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rasmus Tyrsted Mikkelsen, Søren Overgaard, Alma B Pedersen, Johan Kärrholm, Ola Rolfson, Anne Marie Fenstad, Ove Furnes, Geir Hallan, Keijo Mäkelä, Antti Eskelinen, Claus Varnum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.