Hip survival after periacetabular osteotomy in patients with acetabular dysplasia, acetabular retroversion, congenital dislocation of the hip, or Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: a cohort study on 1,501 hips
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.12403Keywords:
Acetabular, Arthroplasty, Calvé-legg-perthes, Congenital dislocation of the hip, Dysplasia, Hip, Osteotomy, Periacetabular, RetroversionAbstract
Background and purpose: Previous studies on hip survival following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) have reported isolated data for the treatment of 1 underlying condition, making comparison between patient groups difficult. We report the hip survival after PAO in patients with acetabular dysplasia (AD), acetabular retroversion (AR), congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH), and Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) with total hip arthroplasty (THA) as primary endpoint and secondarily the risk of subsequent hip-related operations other than THA.
Patients and methods: From 1997 to December 2021, 1,501 hips (1,203 patients) underwent PAO in a single center (Odense University Hospital). We identified conversions to THA and other subsequent hip-related operations through patient files and the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR).
Results: 123 (8.2%) of the total cohort of 1,501 hips were converted to THA within the study period. The overall Kaplan–Meier hip survival rate was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61–79) at 24 years with a mean follow-up of 7.6 years (range 0.02–25). The individual Kaplan–Meier hip survival rates at 15 years were 81% (CI 76–86) for AD, 94% (CI 91–96) for AR, 84% (CI 66–93) for CDH, and 66% (CI 49–79) for LCPD. In total, the overall risk of additional hip-related operations was 48% (of which 92% were screw removal).
Conclusion: Encouragingly, 71% of hips were preserved 24 years after PAO. We found that AR patients had the highest (94%) PAO survivorship at 15 years compared with the other underlying hip conditions. Almost half of PAO patients may undergo later additional surgery, of which screw removal is the primary intervention. Overall long-term survival, risk factors for conversion to THA, and risk of additional surgery are relevant information for shared decision-making.
Downloads
References
Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh T S, Mast J W. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias: technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (232): 26-36. PMID: 3383491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198807000-00006
Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris W H. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466(2): 264-72. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z
Harris W H. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; (213): 20-33. PMID: 3780093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198612000-00004
Giori N J, Trousdale R T. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (417): 263-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093014.90435.64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000093014.90435.64
Matheney T, Kim Y J, Zurakowski D, Matero C, Millis M. Intermediate to long-term results following the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy and predictors of clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(9): 2113-23. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.g.00143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00143
Larsen J B, Mechlenburg I, Jakobsen S S, Thilleman T M, Søballe K. 14-year hip survivorship after periacetabular osteotomy: a follow-up study on 1,385 hips. Acta Orthop 2020; 91(3): 299-305. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1731159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1731159
Wells J, Millis M, Kim Y J, Bulat E, Miller P, Matheney T. Survivorship of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: what factors are associated with long-term failure? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475(2): 396-405. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4887-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4887-z
Wells J, Schoenecker P, Duncan S, Goss C W, Thomason K, Clohisy J C. Intermediate-term hip survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy: the Washington University Experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100(3): 218-25. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.17.00337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00337
Siebenrock K A, Steppacher S D, Tannast M, Büchler L. Anteverting periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular retroversion. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2015; 5(1): e1. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.m.00842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.N.00036
Zurmühle C A, Anwander H, Albers C E, Hanke M S, Steppacher S D, Siebenrock K A, et al. Periacetabular osteotomy provides higher survivorship than rim trimming for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475(4): 1138-50. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5177-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5177-5
Shinoda T, Naito M, Nakamura Y, Kiyama T. Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of dysplastic hip with Perthes-like deformities. Int Orthop 2009; 33(1): 71-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0476-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0476-9
Albers C E, Steppacher S D, Ganz R, Siebenrock K A, Tannast M. Joint-preserving surgery improves pain, range of motion, and abductor strength after Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(9): 2450-61. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2345-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2345-0
Clohisy J C, Nepple J J, Ross J R, Pashos G, Schoenecker P L. Does surgical hip dislocation and periacetabular osteotomy improve pain in patients with Perthes-like deformities and acetabular dysplasia? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(4): 1370-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4115-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4115-7
von Elm E, Altman D G, Egger M, Pocock S J, Gøtzsche P C, Vandenbroucke J P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147(8): 573-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
Schmidt M, Schmidt S A, Sandegaard J L, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen H T. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 2015; 7:449-90. doi: 10.2147/clep.s91125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125
Lerch T D, Steppacher S D, Liechti E F, Tannast M, Siebenrock K A. One-third of hips after periacetabular osteotomy survive 30 years with good clinical results, no progression of arthritis, or conversion to THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475(4): 1154-68. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5169-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5169-5
Hartig-Andreasen C, Troelsen A, Thillemann T M, Søballe K. What factors predict failure 4 to 12 years after periacetabular osteotomy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(11): 2978-87. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2386-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2386-4
Lie S A, Engesaeter L B, Havelin L I, Gjessing H K, Vollset S E. Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients. Stat Med 2004; 23(20): 3227-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.1905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1905
Verhaegen J, Salih S, Thiagarajah S, Grammatopoulos G, Witt J D. Is a periacetabular osteotomy as efficacious in retroversion as it is in dysplasia?: The role of femoral anteversion on outcome. Bone Joint Open 2021; 2(9): 757-64. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.29.bjo-2021-0096.r2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.29.BJO-2021-0096.R2
Bræmer C N, Langberg S A, Jakobsen S S, Jakobsen S R, Aleixo H, Søballe K, et al. Does pain and hip function improve 2 years after reverse periacetabular osteotomy? A follow-up study of 74 patients. J Hip Preserv Surg 2020; 7(1): 130-9. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnz066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnz066
Sohatee M A, Ali M, Khanduja V, Malviya A. Does hip preservation surgery prevent arthroplasty? Quantifying the rate of conversion to arthroplasty following hip preservation surgery. J Hip Preserv Surg 2020; 7(2): 168-82. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnaa022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnaa022
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anne Rosendahl Kristiansen, Anders Holsgaard-Larsen, Morten Bøgehøj, Søren Overgaard, Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Ole Ovesen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
