Association of osteotomy, age, and component fixation with the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip dysplasia: a Dutch population-based registry study

Authors

  • Milou F T Hüsken Clinical Orthopedic Research Center–mN, Diakonessenhuis, Zeist; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht/Zeist; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4112-343X
  • Joëll Magré Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; 3D Lab, Division of Surgical Specialties, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1689-5104
  • Koen Willemsen 3D Lab, Division of Surgical Specialties, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Liza N van Steenbergen Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI), ’s Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8141-842X
  • Mirthe H W Van veghel Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8488-957X
  • Harrie Weinans Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Department Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • Ralph J B Sakkers Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Joris E J Bekkers Clinical Orthopedic Research Center–mN, Diakonessenhuis, Zeist; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht/Zeist, The Netherlands
  • Bart C H van der Wal Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41383

Keywords:

Arthroplasty, Dysplasia, Hip, Implants, Pelvis and acetabulum

Abstract

Background and purpose: Hip dysplasia can present challenges for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to anatomic abnormalities. We aimed to assess the association of age, sex, osteotomies prior to THA, and fixation method on 5- and 10-year revision-free implant survival and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of THAs in patients with hip dysplasia.
Methods: Using Dutch Arthroplasty Register data, we studied hip dysplasia patients receiving primary THAs in 2007–2021 (n = 7,465). THAs were categorized by age, pelvic osteotomy prior to THA (yes/no), and fixation (cemented, uncemented, hybrid, reverse hybrid). Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox models were used to determine 5- and 10-year revision-free implant survival and adjusted hazard ratios including 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Reasons for revision and PROMs were compared within the categories.
Results: We found a 10-year revision-free implant survival of 94.9% (CI 94.3–95.5). Patients younger than 50 years had a 10-year implant survival of 93.3% (CI 91.9–94.7), Patients with prior pelvic osteotomy had a 10-year implant survival of 92.0% (CI 89.8–94.2). Fixation method and sex were not associated with implant survival. Patients with a prior pelvic osteotomy had more revisions due to cup loosening and reported lower PROM scores than patients without earlier osteotomy.
Conclusion: 5- and 10-year revision-free implant survival rates of THA for hip dysplasia are 96.4% and 94.9%. Age and prior osteotomies were associated with decreased implant survival rates in patients with hip dysplasia, while fixation method was not. Prior osteotomies were also associated with reduced PROM scores.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hoaglund F T, Steinbach L S. Primary osteoarthritis of the hip: etiology and epidemiology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001; 9(5): 320-7. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200109000-00005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200109000-00005

Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S. Hip dysplasia: a significant risk factor for the development of hip osteoarthritis. A cross-sectional survey. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005; 44(2): 211-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumtology/keh436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumtology/keh436

Johnsen S P, Sorensen H T, Lucht U, Søballe K, Overgaard S, Pedersen A B. Patient-related predictors of implant failure after primary total hip replacement in the initial, short- and long-terms: a nationwide Danish follow-up study including 36,984 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(10): 1303-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B10.17399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B10.17399

Sanchez-Sotelo J, Berry D J, Trousdale R T, Cabanela M E. Surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in adults: II. Arthroplasty options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002; 10(5): 334-44. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200209000-00005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200209000-00005

Thillemann T M, Pedersen A B, Johnsen S P, Søballe K, Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Implant survival after primary total hip arthroplasty due to childhood hip disorders: results from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop 2008; 79(6): 769-76. doi: 10.1080/17453670810016830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670810016830

Swarup I, Marshall A C, Lee Y Y, Figgie M P. Implant survival and patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty in young patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Hip Int 2016; 26(4): 367-73. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000354

Mei X Y, Gong Y J, Safir O, Gross A, Kuzyk P. Long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: a systematic review of the contemporary literature. Can J Surg 2019; 62(4): 249-58. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.013118

Furnes O, Lie S A, Espehaug B, Vollset S E, Engesaeter L B, Havelin L I. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements: a review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987–99. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83(4): 579-86. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b4.11223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.83B4.11223

Engesaeter L B, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Lie S A, Vollset S E. Survival of total hip arthroplasties after DDH in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987–2004. Hip Int 2007; 17(Suppl 5): S119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2008.2465

Duncan S, Wingerter S, Keith A, Fowler S A, Clohisy J. Does previous osteotomy compromise total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(1): 79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.08.030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.08.030

Shapira J, Annin S, Rosinsky P J, Maldonado D R, Lall A C, Domb B G. Total hip arthroplasty after pelvic osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia: a systematic review. J Orthop 2021; 25: 112-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2021.04.001

van Steenbergen L N, Denissen G A, Spooren A, van Rooden S M, van Oosterhout F J, Morrenhof J W, et al. More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(4): 498-505. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1028307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1028307

Information on orthopaedic prosthesis procedures in the Netherlands [LROI Report]. Available from: lroi-report.nl.

Engesaeter L B, Furnes O, Havelin L I. Developmental dysplasia of the hip—good results of later total hip arthroplasty: 7135 primary total hip arthroplasties after developmental dysplasia of the hip compared with 59774 total hip arthroplasties in idiopathic coxarthrosis followed for 0 to 15 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23(2): 235-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.023

Boyle M J, Frampton C M, Crawford H A. Early results of total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip compared with patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27(3): 386-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.024

Kuijpers M F L, Hannink G, van Steenbergen L N, Schreurs B W. Total hip arthroplasty in young patients in The Netherlands: trend analysis of >19,000 primary hip replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33(12): 3704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.020

Bus M P A, Gademan M G J, Fiocco M, Nelissen R G H H, de Witte P B. Pediatric hip disorders are not associated with an increased 10-year revision risk after total hip arthroplasty under the age of 55: results from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 472–6. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41342

Coretti S, Ruggeri M, McNamee P. The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014; 14(2): 221-33. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.894462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2014.894462

Beard D J, Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H, Murray D W, Carr A J, et al. Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68(1): 73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009

Lyman S, Lee Y Y, McLawhorn A S, Islam W, MacLean C H. What are the minimal and substantial improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR versions after total joint replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476(12): 2432-41. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000456

Kim M, Kadowaki T. High long-term survival of bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in cementless THA for developmental hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(6): 1611-20. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1288-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1288-6

Pakos E E, Stafilas K S, Tsovilis A E, Vafiadis J N, Kalos N K, Xenakis T A. Long term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with custom made femoral implants in patients with congenital disease of hip. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(12): 2242-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.038

Migaud H, Putman S, Berton C, Lefevre C, Huten D, Argenson J N, et al. Does prior conservative surgery affect survivorship and functional outcome in total hip arthroplasty for congenital dislocation of the hip? A case-control study in 159 hips. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014; 100(7): 733-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.016

Pedersen A B, Mehnert F, Havelin L I, Furnes O, Herberts P, Kärrholm J, et al. Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22(5): 659-67. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.03.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.03.005

Clement N D, Biant L C, Breusch S J. Total hip arthroplasty: to cement or not to cement the acetabular socket? A critical review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132(3): 411-27. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1422-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1422-2

Published

2024-09-13

How to Cite

Hüsken, M. F. T., Magré, J., Willemsen, K., van Steenbergen, L. N., Van veghel, M. H. W., Weinans, H., … van der Wal, B. C. H. (2024). Association of osteotomy, age, and component fixation with the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip dysplasia: a Dutch population-based registry study. Acta Orthopaedica, 95, 545–552. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41383

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories