Clinical outcome after undisplaced femoral neck fractures

Authors

  • Jan-Erik Gjertsen
  • Jonas M Fevang
  • Kjell Matre
  • Tarjei Vinje
  • Lars B Engesæter

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.588857

Abstract

Background and purpose Little attention has been paid to undisplaced femoral neck fractures. By using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, we investigated the risk of reoperation and the clinical outcome after treatment of these fractures in patients over 60 years of age.Methods Data on 4,468 patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures who were operated with screw osteosynthesis were compared to those from 10,289 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with screw osteosynthesis (n = 3,389) or bipolar hemiarthroplasty (n = 6,900). The evaluation was based on number of reoperations and patient assessment at 4 and 12 months of follow-up.Results The 1-year implant survival was 89% after screw fixation for undisplaced fractures, 79% after screw fixation for displaced fractures, and 97% after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures. Patients with displaced fractures who were operated with internal fixation had a higher risk of reoperation (RR = 1.9, CI: 1.7–2.2), reported more pain, were less satisfied, and had lower quality of life than patients with undisplaced fractures treated with internal fixation (p Interpretation The differences in clinical outcome found were less than what is considered to be of clinical importance. The results support the use of screw osteosynthesis for undisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, although even better results were obtained in the hemiarthroplasty group in patients with displaced fractures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-06-01

How to Cite

Gjertsen, J.-E., Fevang, J. M., Matre, K., Vinje, T., & Engesæter, L. B. (2011). Clinical outcome after undisplaced femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthopaedica, 82(3), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.588857