Good accuracy of the Phase III Oxford Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Instrumentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.813801Abstract
Background and purpose — Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) needs careful balancing of flexion/extension (F/E) gaps to prevent dislocation of the mobile meniscal bearing. Assessment of gaps is based on the surgeon’s subjective insertion force of a feeler gauge with different thicknesses and/or the lift-off of a trial meniscal bearing. However, the accuracy of this method remains unclear. We assessed the accuracy of the technique.Patients and methods — A consecutive series of 33 UKAs in 32 patients (mean age 64 years, 24 women) were balanced using the Oxford Phase III (OP III) Instrumentation. The recommended technique for F/E gap assessment was performed using different feeler gauges with 1-mm increments and the meniscal bearing lift-off tests according to surgical technique. A tensiometer was inserted and both gaps were maximally distracted by hand. Measurements in mm were recorded and analyzed with a reading of 90 N for both gaps in 20 and 90 degrees of flexion.Results — The gaps measured were 12 (11–18) mm in extension and 13 (11–18) mm in 90 degrees of flexion. The difference between the gaps was 0.4 (–0.5 to 1.0) mm (p Interpretation — OP III instrumentation using feeler gauges and the lift-off test provides accurate balancing of F/E gaps with an accuracy of less than 1 mm.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2013-08-01
How to Cite
Bitsch, R. G., Keudell, A. von, Losina, E., & Fitz, W. (2013). Good accuracy of the Phase III Oxford Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Instrumentation. Acta Orthopaedica, 84(4), 406–409. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.813801
Issue
Section
Articles
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
