Relationship between histological findings of vastus lateralis muscle and function after total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip fracture: a prospective cohort study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42099Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Hip, MuscleAbstract
Background and purpose: We aimed to examine the histological characteristics of vastus lateralis muscles in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) following femoral neck fractures and to explore the correlation between muscle fiber types and postoperative functional recovery.
Methods: 34 patients undergoing THA for femoral neck fractures were included. A biopsy of the vastus lateralis muscle was performed during surgery, followed by immunohistochemical staining. Subsequently, image analysis was conducted to measure the average area of muscle fiber types and the number of type I and II muscle fibers, and the ratio of the area and the number of type II muscle fibers. Functional recovery was assessed 2 weeks post-surgery using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).
Results: A significant positive correlation was observed between type II muscle fibers and SPPB scores. The ratio of type II muscle fiber area and number strongly correlated with the SPPB scores, indicating a robust static association. The average area of type II fibers showed a strong correlation (r = 0.63, P < 0.001), as did the number of type II fibers (r = 0.53, P = 0.001). Moreover, the ratio of type II muscle fiber area and number significantly correlated with SPPB scores (area: r = 0.77, P < 0.001; number: r = 0.51, P = 0.002), indicating that larger and more numerous type II fibers are associated with better physical performance.
Conclusion: The reduction of type II muscle fibers was strongly correlated with a low SPPB postoperative functional recovery in patients who underwent THA following femoral neck fractures.
Downloads
References
Cruz-Jentoft A J, Baeyens J P, Bauer J M, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010; 39(4): 412-23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq034.
Mundi S, Pindiprolu B, Simunovic N, Bhandari M. Similar mortality rates in hip fracture patients over the past 31 years: a systematic review of RCTs. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 54-9. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.878831.
Huang P, Luo K, Xu J, Huang W, Yin W, Xiao M, et al. Sarcopenia as a risk factor for future hip fracture: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021; 25: 183-8. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1474-5.
Xu B Y, Yan S, Low L L, Vasanwala F F, Low S G. Predictors of poor functional outcomes and mortality in patients with hip fracture: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2950-0.
Kim H S, Park J W, Lee Y K, Yoo J I, Choi Y S, Yoon B H, et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia and mortality rate in older adults with hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022; 70(8): 2379-85. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17905.
Kim Y K, Yi S R, Lee Y H, Kwon J, Jang S I, Park S H. Effect of sarcopenia on postoperative mortality in osteoporotic hip fracture patients. J Bone Metab 2018; 25(4): 227-33. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2018.25.4.227.
Janssen I. Evolution of sarcopenia research. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010; 35(5): 707-12. doi: 10.1139/H10-067.
Lee W S, Cheung W H, Qin L, Tang N, Leung K S. Age-associated decrease of type IIA/B human skeletal muscle fibers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 450: 231-7. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218757.97063.21.
Terracciano C, Celi M, Lecce D, Baldi J, Rastelli E, Lena E, et al. Differential features of muscle fiber atrophy in osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24(3): 1095-100. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1990-1.
Tanganelli F, Meinke P, Hofmeister F, Jarmusch S, Baber L, Mehaffey S, et al. Type-2 muscle fiber atrophy is associated with sarcopenia in elderly men with hip fracture. Exp Gerontol 2021; 144: 111171. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.111171.
Lang T, Streeper T, Cawthon P, Baldwin K, Taaffe D R, Harris T. Sarcopenia: etiology, clinical consequences, intervention, and assessment. Osteoporos Int 2010; 21(4): 543-59. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1059-y.
Cruz-Jentoft A J, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019; 48(1): 16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz046.
Koval K J, Skovron M L, Aharonoff G B, Meadows S E, Zuckerman J D. Ambulatory ability after hip fracture: a prospective study in geriatric patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (310): 150-9.
Guralnik J M, Simonsick E M, Ferrucci L, Glynn R J, Berkman L F, Blazer D G, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994; 49(2): M85-M94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, London: Routledge; 2013.
Herrmann M, Engelke K, Ebert R, Müller-Deubert S, Rudert M, Ziouti F, et al. Interactions between muscle and bone—where physics meets biology. Biomolecules 2020; 10(3): 432. doi: 10.3390/biom10030432.
Kaji H. Interaction between muscle and bone. J Bone Metab 2014; 21(1): 29-40. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2014.21.1.29.s.
Yoo J I, Ha Y C, Kwon H B, Lee Y K, Koo K H, Yoo M J. High prevalence of sarcopenia in Korean patients after hip fracture: a case-control study. J Korean Med Sci 2016; 31(9): 1479-84. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1479.
Huang R P, Rubin C T, McLeod K J. Changes in postural muscle dynamics as a function of age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1999; 54(8): B352-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/54.8.b352.
Deschenes M R. Effects of aging on muscle fibre type and size. Sports Med 2004; 34(12): 809-24. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434120-00002.
Wang E, Nyberg S K, Hoff J, Zhao J, Leivseth G, Tørhaug T, et al. Impact of maximal strength training on work efficiency and muscle fiber type in the elderly: implications for physical function and fall prevention. Exp Gerontol 2017; 91: 64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.02.071.
Gibala M J, Little J P, MacDonald M J, Hawley J A. Physiological adaptations to low–volume, high–intensity interval training in health and disease. J Physiol. 2012; 590(5): 1077-84. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.224725.
Schoenfeld B J, Peterson M D, Ogborn D, Contreras B, Sonmez G T. Effects of low-vs. high-load resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29(10):2 954-63. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000958.
Peterson M D, Rhea M R, Sen A, Gordon P M. Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2010; 9(3): 226-37. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004.
Schoenfeld B J, Grgic J. Effects of range of motion on muscle development during resistance training interventions: a systematic review. SAGE Open Med 2020; 8: 2050312120901559. doi: 10.1177/2050312120901559.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Suk-Kyoon Song, Ji-Hyun Hwang, Jin-Woo Bae, Hoon-Kyu Oh, Myung-Rae Cho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.