Regional variations in incidence and treatment trends of Achilles tendon ruptures in Finland: a nationwide study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41089Keywords:
Achilles tendon rupture, Epidemiology, Geographic variations, Regional variations, Treatment methodAbstract
Background and purpose: The aim of our study was to assess the regional variations in Achilles tendon rupture incidence and treatment methods in Finland during the period 1997–2019.
Methods: The Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register (NHDR) and the Finnish Register of Primary Health Care Visits (PHCR) were searched to identify all adult patients diagnosed with Achilles tendon rupture during our study period. The population-based annual incidence and incidences of surgically and non-surgically treated Achilles tendon ruptures were calculated for each hospital district.
Results: Achilles tendon rupture incidence increased from 17.3 per 105 person-years in 1997 to 32.3 per 105 in 2019. The mean incidence of Achilles tendon ruptures ranged from 26.4 per 105 (North Savo) to 37.2 per 105 (Central Ostrobothnia). The incidence of Achilles tendon ruptures increased in all areas. The proportion of non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures ranged in 1997 from 7% (Vaasa) to 67% (Åland) and in 2019 from 73% (Southwest Finland) to 100% (East Savo, Kainuu, Länsi-Pohja, Åland). During the study period, a shift towards non-surgical treatment was evident in all hospital districts.
Conclusion: Regional variations in Achilles tendon rupture incidence exist in Finland; however, the incidence increased in all areas during the follow-up period. More Achilles tendon rupture patients are currently being treated non-surgically throughout the country.
Downloads
References
Erickson B J, Cvetanovich G L, Nwachukwu B U, Villarroel L D, Lin J L, Bach B R, et al. Trends in the management of Achilles tendon ruptures in the United States Medicare population, 2005–2011. Orthop J Sports Med 2014; 2(9): 2325967114549948. doi: 10.1177/2325967114549948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967114549948
Leino O, Keskinen H, Laaksonen I, Mäkelä K, Löyttyniemi E, Ekman E. Incidence and treatment trends of Achilles tendon ruptures in Finland: a nationwide study. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10(11): 232596712211315. doi: 10.1177/23259671221131536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221131536
Ganestam A, Kallemose T, Troelsen A, Barfod K W. Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013: a nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24(12): 3730-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3544-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3544-5
Huttunen T T, Kannus P, Rolf C, Felländer-Tsai L, Mattila V M. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures: incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42(10): 2419-23. doi: 10.1177/0363546514540599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514540599
Ho G, Tantigate D, Kirschenbaum J, Greisberg J K, Vosseller J T. Increasing age in Achilles rupture patients over time. Injury 2017; 48(7): 1701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.007
Raikin S M, Garras D N, Krapchev P V. Achilles tendon injuries in a United States population. Foot Ankle Int 2013; 34(4): 475-80. doi: 10.1177/1071100713477621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713477621
Levi N. The incidence of Achilles tendon rupture in Copenhagen. Injury 1997; 28(4): 311-13. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00200-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(96)00200-8
Deng S, Sun Z, Zhang C, Chen G, Li J. Surgical treatment versus conservative management for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Foot Ankle Surg 2017; 56(6): 1236-43. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.036
Erickson B J, Mascarenhas R, Saltzman B M, Walton D, Lee S, Cole B J, et al. Is operative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures superior to nonoperative treatment?: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Orthop J Sports Med 2015; 3(4): 2325967115579188. doi: 10.1177/2325967115579188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967115579188
Seow D, Yasui Y, Calder J D F, Kennedy J G, Pearce C J. Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of complication rates with best- and worst-case analyses for rerupture rates. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49(13): 3728-48. doi: 10.1177/0363546521998284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546521998284
Meulenkamp B, Woolnough T, Cheng W, Shorr R, Stacey D, Richards M, et al. What is the best evidence to guide management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479(10): 2119-31. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001861
Sheth U, Wasserstein D, Jenkinson R, Moineddin R, Kreder H, Jaglal S B. The epidemiology and trends in management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study of 27 607 patients. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B(1): 78-86. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0434.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0434.R1
Nyyssönen T, Lüthje P, Kröger H. The increasing incidence and difference in sex distribution of Achilles tendon rupture in Finland in 1987–1999. Scand J Surg 2008; 97(3): 272-5. doi: 10.1177/145749690809700312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690809700312
Sund R. Quality of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: a systematic review. Scand J Public Health 2012; 40(6): 505-15. doi: 10.1177/1403494812456637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812456637
Mattila V M, Sillanpää P, Iivonen T, Parkkari J, Kannus P, Pihlajamäki H. Coverage and accuracy of diagnosis of cruciate ligament injury in the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register. Injury 2008;39(12): 1373–6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.05.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.05.007
Huttunen T T, Kannus P, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila V M. Pertrochanteric fracture of the femur in the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register: validity of procedural coding, external cause for injury and diagnosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 98. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03565-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-98
Statistics Finland. Population structure. Available from: https://stat.fi/index_en.html (accessed October 9, 2022).
Birkmeyer J D, Reames B N, McCulloch P, Carr A J, Campbell W B, Wennberg J E. Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. Lancet 2013; 382(9898): 1121-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61215-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61215-5
Floyd S B, Campbell J, Chapman C G, Thigpen C A, Kissenberth M J, Brooks J M. Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14(1): 2 2. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1052-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1052-2
Leung F, Lau T W, Kwan K, Chow S P, Kung A W C. Does timing of surgery matter in fragility hip fractures? Osteoporos Int 2010; 21(Suppl 4): S529-34. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1391-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1391-2
Statistics Finland. Population prediction. Available from: http://www.stat.fi/til/vaenn/2021/vaenn_2021_2021-09-30_tie_001_fi.html (accessed April 5 2022).
Borodulin K, Laatikainen T, Juolevi A, Jousilahti P. Thirty-year trends of physical activity in relation to age, calendar time and birth cohort in Finnish adults. Eur J Public Health 2008; 18(3): 339-44. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckm092
Barengo N C, Nissinen A, Tuomilehto J, Pekkarinen H. Twenty-five-year trends in physical activity of 30- to 59-year-old populations in eastern Finland. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34(8): 1302-7. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200208000-00011
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marjukka Hallinen, Henri Sallinen, Heli Keskinen, Markus Matilainen, Elina Ekman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
