Greater frequency of distraction accelerates bone formation in open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy with hemicallotasis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001475Abstract
Background In chickens, increased distraction frequency stimulates bone formation in distraction osteogenesis.Patients and methods We investigated the effect of two different distraction frequencies on bone formation in the distracted portion, and on the time of removal of the fixator, in open-wedge osteotomies of the proximal tibia with hemicallotasis (HCO). The study included 20 consecutive patients (20 knees) who underwent HCO for medial osteoarthrosis of the knee. 10 knees were distracted at a rate of 0.25 mm four times a day (the 4-step group); and the other 10 knees were distracted at a rate of 0.125 mm eight times a day (the 8-step group).Results There were no significant differences in the preoperative FTAs or the correction angles between the two groups. At all intervals until 6 weeks after the completion of distraction, bone mineral density in the distraction gap was significantly higher in the 8-step group than in the 4-step group. The average time in external fixation was 78 (SD 5) days in the 8-step group as compared to 89 (SD 6) days in the 4-step group, a significantly shorter time.Interpretation Our findings indicate that an increase in the distraction frequency in HCO provides better bone formation, resulting in a shorter external fixation period.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2004-01-01
How to Cite
Mizuta, H., Nakamura, E., Kudo, S., Maeda, T., & Takagi, K. (2004). Greater frequency of distraction accelerates bone formation in open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy with hemicallotasis. Acta Orthopaedica, 75(5), 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001475
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.