Failure mechanisms in uncemented Kudo type 5 elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 7 of 49 ulnar components revised because of loosening after 2–10 years

Authors

  • Justus-Martijn Brinkman
  • Maarten J De Vos
  • Denise Eygendaal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710013780

Abstract

Background Both components of the Kudo type 5 elbow prosthesis can be inserted with or without the use of cement. There have been no reports on the use of this prosthesis with all components uncemented in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients and methods We reviewed 49 primary uncemented Kudo type 5 elbow prostheses, inserted in 36 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, after mean 6 (2–10) years. Patients were assessed clinically both pre- and postoperatively (pain, instability, motion, ulnar neuropathy) and radiographically. Furthermore, at the time of follow-up clinical outcome was assessed using the Elbow Function Assessment Scale. Results At review, 7 of 49 elbows had undergone revision because of symptomatic loosening of the ulnar component. In 42 unrevised elbows, clinical outcome was excellent in 29, good in 7, fair in 5, and poor in one. 31 of 42 elbows had no pain; 11 were painful at rest (VAS 1–2) and/or as a result of activity (VAS 1–8). With revision as endpoint, survival was 86% at 6 years. Intraoperative malpositioning of the ulnar component with a valgus or varus alignment of < 5° was associated with worse survival. Interpretation We found an unexpectedly high rate of loosening of the ulnar component, which was associated with intraoperative malpositioning of the prosthesis. The ulnar component of this prosthesis should not be inserted without cement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2007-01-01

How to Cite

Brinkman, J.-M., De Vos, M. J., & Eygendaal, D. (2007). Failure mechanisms in uncemented Kudo type 5 elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 7 of 49 ulnar components revised because of loosening after 2–10 years. Acta Orthopaedica, 78(2), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710013780