Staged external and internal locked plating for open distal tibial fractures

Authors

  • Ching-Hou Ma
  • Shang-Won Yu
  • Yuan-Kun Tu
  • Cheng-Yo Yen
  • James Jih-Hsi Yeh
  • Chin-Hsien Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.487244

Abstract

Background and purpose Based on reported success with staged treatment of distal tibial fractures, we designed a 2-stage protocol including external/internal locked plating. We retrospectively assessed the outcome of open distal tibial fractures treated according to this protocol. Patients and methods From March 2006 through July 2008, 16 patients who sustained open distal tibial fractures were treated by a two-stage protocol. The first stage consisted of low-profile, locked plates for temporary external fixation after debridement and anatomic reduction, followed by soft tissue reconstruction. The second stage consisted of locked plates for definitive internal fixation, using minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis. All fractures were followed for median 2 (1–3) years. Results The reduction was classified as being good in 15 patients and fair in 1 patient. All fractures united at a median of 6 (6–12) months. At the latest follow-up, 7 patients had excellent and 9 had good Iowa ankle scores; ankle motion ranged from a median of 10 (5–20) degrees of dorsiflexion to 40 (20–60) degrees of plantar flexion. Interpretation We believe that the 2-stage external/internal locked plating technique is an effective procedure for treatment of open distal tibial fractures in patients who need a long period of external fixation. We achieved good reduction with immediate ankle-sparing stable fixation. Soft tissue reconstruction and subsequent definitive fixation led to union of all fractures with good function.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2010-06-01

How to Cite

Ma, C.-H., Yu, S.-W., Tu, Y.-K., Yen, C.-Y., Yeh, J. J.-H., & Wu, C.-H. (2010). Staged external and internal locked plating for open distal tibial fractures. Acta Orthopaedica, 81(3), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.487244