More accurate component alignment in navigated total knee arthroplasty has no clinical benefit at 5-year follow-up
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.747923Abstract
Background and purpose Computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty is somewhat controversial. We have previously shown that femoral component positioning is more accurate with computed navigation than with conventional implantation techniques, but the clinical impact of this is unknown. We now report the 5-year outcome of our previously reported 2-year outcome study.Methods 78 of initially 84 patients (80 of 86 knees) were clinically and radiographically reassessed 5 (5.1–5.9) years after conventional, image-based, and image-free total knee arthroplasty. The methodology was identical to that used preoperatively and at 2 years, including the Knee Society score (KSS) and the functional score (FS), and AP and true lateral standard radiographs.Results Although a more accurate femoral component positioning in the navigated groups was obtained, clinical outcome, number of reoperations, KSS, FS, and range of motion were similar between the groups.Interpretation The increased costs and time for navigated techniques did not translate into better functional and subjective medium-term outcome compared to conventional techniques.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2012-12-01
How to Cite
Hoppe, S., Mainzer, J. D., Frauchiger, L., Ballmer, P. M., Hess, R., & Zumstein, M. A. (2012). More accurate component alignment in navigated total knee arthroplasty has no clinical benefit at 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthopaedica, 83(6), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.747923
Issue
Section
Articles
License
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41216/412162e964b4a245ad8fab914986f78ff1c6cece" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.