Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899846Abstract
Background and purpose — High primary stability is important for long-term survival of uncemented femoral stems. Different stem designs are currently in use. The ABG-I is a well-documented anatomical stem with a press-fit design. The Unique stem is designed for a tight customized fit to the cortical bone of the upper femur. This implant was initially developed for patients with abnormal anatomy, but the concept can also be used in patients with normal femoral anatomy. We present 5-year radiostereometric analysis (RSA) results from a randomized study comparing the ABG-I anatomical stem with the Unique femoral stem.Patients and methods — 100 hips with regular upper femur anatomy were randomized to either the ABG-I stem or the Unique femoral stem. RSA measurements were performed postoperatively and after 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months.Results — RSA measurements from 80 hips were available for analysis at the 5-year follow-up. Small amounts of movement were observed for both stems, with no statistically significant differences between the 2 types.Interpretation — No improvement in long-term stability was found from using a customized stem design. However, no patients with abnormal geometry of the upper femur were included in this study.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2014-04-01
How to Cite
Nysted, M., Foss, O. A., Klaksvik, J., Benum, P., Haugan, K., Husby, O. S., & Aamodt, A. (2014). Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs. Acta Orthopaedica, 85(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899846
Issue
Section
Articles
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.