Discontinuing the recommendation of hip precautions does not increase the risk of early dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty using 36-mm heads: a population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Authors

  • Afrim Iljazi Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
  • Michala Skovlund Sørensen Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-2666
  • Matilde Winther-Jensen Department of Data, Biostatistics and Pharmacoepidemiology, Centre for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg
  • Søren Overgaard Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-4787
  • Michael Mørk Petersen Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-6420

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41168

Abstract

Background and purpose: Dislocation is a severe complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip precautions have been recommended in the initial postoperative period but evidence supporting this practice is limited. We therefore conducted a population-based study to evaluate the association between discontinuing recommending postoperative hip precautions and the risk of early dislocation.
Methods: This is a cohort study with data from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Danish National Patient Register. We included patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis in 2004–2019 in public hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. The cohort was divided into the hip precautions group, comprising patients operated on between 2004 and 2009, and the no-precautions group operated on between 2014 and 2019. The primary outcome was the difference in the absolute risk of dislocation within 3 months post-surgery. The secondary outcome assessed the same risk within 2 years. We evaluated the difference in absolute risk using absolute risk regression (ARR).
Results: The cumulative incidence of dislocation within 3 months was 2.9% (confidence interval [CI] 2.5–3.3) in the hip precautions group and 3.5% (CI 3.1–3.9) in the no-precautions group. The risk of dislocation was higher in the no-precautions group but failed to reach statistical significance in the crude (ARR 1.2, CI 0.9–1.6) and multivariate model (ARR 1.4, CI 0.9–2.2).
Conclusion: We found a higher but statistically insignificant increase in the risk of early dislocation in the no-precautions group. The lack of significance in the association may be explained by the increased use of 36-mm femoral heads after the guideline revision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bozic K J, Kamath A F, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz S, Chan V, et al. Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(6): 2131-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4078-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4078-8

Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. National Annual Report. 2021. http://danskhoftealloplastikregister.dk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/DHR-aarsrapport-2021_Udgivet-2022_offentliggjort-version.pdf.

Gillinov S M, Joo P Y, Zhu J R, Moran J, Rubin L E, Grauer J N. Incidence, timing, and predictors of hip dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30(21): 1047-53. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00150

Hermansen L L, Viberg B, Overgaard S. Risk factors for dislocation and re-revision after first-time revision total hip arthroplasty due to recurrent dislocation: a study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36(4): 1407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.004

Woo R Y, Morrey B F. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64(9): 1295-306. PMID: 7142237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198264090-00004

Nadzadi M E, Pedersen D R, Yack H J, Callaghan J J, Brown T D. Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. J Biomech 2003; 36(4): 577-91. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00232-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00232-4

Tejwani N C, Immerman I. Myths and legends in orthopaedic practice: are we all guilty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466(11): 2861-72. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0458-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0458-2

Husted H, Gromov K, Malchau H, Freiberg A, Gebuhr P, Troelsen A. Traditions and myths in hip and knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(6): 548-55. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.971661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.971661

Talbot N J, Brown J H M, Treble N J. Early dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: are postoperative restrictions necessary? J Arthroplasty 2002;17(8):1006-8. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.34534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.34534

Ververeli P A, Lebby E B, Tyler C, Fouad C. Evaluation of reducing postoperative hip precautions in total hip replacement: a randomized prospective study. Orthopedics 2009; 32(12): 889. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20091020-09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20091020-09

Restrepo C, Mortazavi S M J, Brothers J, Parvizi J, Rothman R H. Hip dislocation: are hip precautions necessary in anterior approaches? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469(2): 417-22. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1668-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1668-y

Benchimol E I, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Peteresen I, et al. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement. PLOS Med. 2015; 12(10): e1001885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885

Gundtoft P H, Varnum C, Pedersen A B, Overgaard S. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Clin Epidemiol 2016; 8: 509-14. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S99498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S99498

Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard J L, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen H T. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 2015; 7: 449-90. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S91125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125

Hermansen L L, Viberg B, Overgaard S. Development of a diagnostic algorithm identifying cases of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty-based on 31,762 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2021; 92(2): 137-42. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1868708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1868708

Gerds T A, Ohlendorff S, Ozenne B. riskRegression: Risk regression models and prediction scores for survival analysis with competing risks. 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/package=riskRegression.

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2023. https://www.r.project.org/.

Gerds T. prodlim: Product-limit estimation for censored event history analysis. 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/package=prodlim.

Kunutsor S K, Barrett M C, Beswick A D, Judge A, Blom A W, Wylde V, et al. Risk factors for dislocation after primary total hip replacement: meta-analysis of 125 studies involving approximately five million hip replacements. Lancet Rheumatol 2019; 1(2): e111-21. doi: 10.1016/s2665-9913(19)30045-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30045-1

Korfitsen C B, Mikkelsen L R, Mikkelsen M-L, Rohde J F, Holm P M, Tarp S, et al. Hip precautions after posterior-approach total hip arthroplasty among patients with primary hip osteoarthritis do not influence early recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies with 8,835 patients. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 141-51. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.11958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.11958

Machin J T, Gray W K, Roberts A, Kenworthy L, Manktelow A R J, Briggs T W R. An analysis of a national administrative dataset demonstrating no evidence of increase in elective primary total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates when postoperative hip precautions are not used. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37(12): 2365-73 doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.040

Hernandez N M, Steele J R, Wu C J, Cunningham D J, Aggrey G K, Bolognesi M P, et al. A specific capsular repair technique lowered early dislocations in primary total hip arthroplasty through a posterior approach. Arthroplast Today 2020; 6(4): 813-8. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.044

Prietzel T, Hammer N, Schleifenbaum S, Adler D, Pretzsch M, Köhler L, et al. Der Einfluss der Kapselrekonstruktion auf die Luxationsrate nach primärer Hüftendoprothetik: eine retrospektive Analyse von 1972 Fällen [The impact of capsular repair on the dislocation rate after primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 1972 cases]. Z Orthop Unfall 2014; 152(2): 130-43 [in German]. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1368209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1368209

Zijlstra W P, De Hartog B, Van Steenbergen L N, Scheurs B W, Nelissen R G H H. Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(4): 395-401. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1317515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1317515

van Steenbergen L N, de Reus I M, Hannink G, Vehmeijer S B, Schreurs B W, Zijlstra W P. Femoral head size and surgical approach affect dislocation and overall revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: up to 9-year follow-up data of 269,280 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Hip Int 2023; 33(6): 1056-62. doi: 10.1177/11207000231160223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000231160223

Tetreault M W, Akram F, Li J, Nam D, Gerlinger T L, Della Valle C J, et al. Are postoperative hip precautions necessary after primary total hip arthroplasty using a posterior approach? Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35(6S): S246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.019

Lee G R H, Berstock J R, Whitehouse M R, Blom A W. Recall and patient perceptions of hip precautions 6 weeks after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(5): 496-9. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1350008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1350008

McNaught J, Davidson D, Ewen A, Welsh F, Maheshwari R. Patient compliance with hip precautions 12 weeks following primary elective total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 142(10): 2429-33. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03837-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03837-9

Lightfoot C J, Coole C, Sehat K, Brewin C, Drummond A. Clinicians’ experiences of discontinuing routine hip precautions following total hip replacement surgery: a qualitative analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44(16): 4227-32. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1884759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1884759

Mandel R T, Bruce G, Moss R, Carrington R W J, Gilbert A W. Hip precautions after primary total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative exploration of clinical reasoning. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44(12): 2842-8. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1845825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1845825

Published

2024-07-18

How to Cite

Iljazi, A., Sørensen, M. S., Winther-Jensen, M., Overgaard, S., & Petersen, M. M. (2024). Discontinuing the recommendation of hip precautions does not increase the risk of early dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty using 36-mm heads: a population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthopaedica, 95, 407–414. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41168

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories