3-dimensional computer tomography is more accurate than traditional long-leg radiographs in the planning and evaluation of coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study on 121 knees

Eirik Aunan; Eivind Alhaug; Siri G Schuller; Jan E Rundfloen

doi:10.2340/17453674.2023.19695

Authors

Eirik Aunan Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sykehuset Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8337-1776
Eivind Alhaug Department of Radiology, Sykehuset Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway
Siri G Schuller Department of Radiology, Sykehuset Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway
Jan E Rundfloen Department of Radiology, Sykehuset Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.19695

Keywords:

Arthroplasty, HKA, Knee, outlier identification, Radiological imaging

Abstract

Background and purpose: Accurate measuring tools are essential in preoperative planning and for the study of the association between postoperative alignment and clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to describe a simple method to measure preoperative hip–knee–femoral shaft (HKFS) angle and postoperative coronal alignment in TKA with the use of standard 3D CT and to compare preoperative HKFS angles and postoperative coronal alignment measured with the 3D CT technique and with standing long-leg hip–knee–ankle (HKA) radiographs.
Patients and methods: HKA radiographs and 3D CT were taken preoperatively and 3 months after the operation in 121 knees. The interrater reliability for the 3D CT method was calculated with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The preoperative HKFS angles and the postoperative deformity measured with the 2 methods were compared and illustrated on Bland–Altman plots, frequency tables, and by Cohen’s kappa coefficients (k).
Results: The 3D CT method was feasible in all knees and the ICC was excellent. Mean (SD, range) difference in HKFS angle measured on HKA radiographs and on 3D CT was –0.3° (0.9°, –4.1° to 2.4°). Mean (SD, range) difference in postoperative deformity was 0.1° (1.6°, –5° to 6°). The 95% limits of agreement were 1.4° and –2° for HKFS and ±3° for postoperative alignment. The agreement in outlier (≥ 3°) identification was moderate with a k (95% confidence interval) of 0.48 (0.32–0.64).
Conclusion: 3-dimensional computer tomography was feasible and was shown to be more accurate than traditional long-leg radiographs

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Matsuda S, Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y. Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471(1): 127-33. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2533-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2533-y

Wan X F, Yang Y, Wang D, Xu H, Huang C, Zhou Z K, et al. Comparison of outcomes after total knee arthroplasty involving postoperative neutral or residual mild varus alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Surg 2022; 14(2): 177-89. doi: 10.1111/os.13155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13155

Liu H X, Shang P, Ying X Z, Zhang Y. Shorter survival rate in varusaligned knees after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24(8): 2663-71. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3781-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3781-7

Oussedik S, Abdel M P, Victor J, Pagnano M W, Haddad F S. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B(3): 276-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1729

Abdel M P, Ollivier M, Parratte S, Trousdale R T, Berry D J, Pagnano M W. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on survival and functional outcomes of modern total knee arthroplasties with cement: a concise follow-up at 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100(6): 472-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01587

Sires J D, Wilson C J. CT validation of intraoperative implant position and knee alignment as determined by the MAKO total knee arthroplasty system. J Knee Surg 2021; 34(10): 1133-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701447

Li Z, Chen X, Wang X, Zhang B, Wang W, Fan Y, et al. HURWA robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment: a prospective randomized and multicenter study. J Orthop Translat 2022; 33: 31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.12.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2021.12.004

Abu-Rajab R B, Deakin A H, Kandasami M, McGlynn J, Picard F, Kinninmonth A W. Hip–knee–ankle radiographs are more appropriate for assessment of post-operative mechanical alignment of total knee arthroplasties than standard AP knee radiographs. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(4): 695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.024

Babazadeh S, Dowsey M M, Bingham R J, Ek E T, Stoney J D, Choong P F. The long leg radiograph is a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer-assisted navigation and computer tomography. Knee 2013; 20(4): 242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.07.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.07.009

Kawahara S, Mawatari T, Matsui G, Mizu-Uchi H, Hamai S, Akasaki Y, et al. Malrotation of whole-leg radiograph less than 10 degrees does not influence preoperative planning in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Res 2020. doi: 10.1002/jor.24845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24845

Kawakami H, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Hattori A, et al. Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Orthop Res 2004; 22(6): 1248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.03.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2004.03.016

Lonner J H, Laird M T, Stuchin S A. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996(331): 102-6. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199610000-00014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199610000-00014

Berger R A, Rubash H E, Seel M J, Thompson W H, Crossett L S. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993(286): 40-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199301000-00008

Oussedik S, Scholes C, Ferguson D, Roe J, Parker D. Is femoral component rotation in a TKA reliably guided by the functional flexion axis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(11): 3227-32. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2515-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2515-0

Leon-Munoz V J, Lopez-Lopez M, Martinez-Martinez F, Santonja-Medina F. Comparison of weight-bearing full-length radiographs and computed-tomography-scan-based three-dimensional models in the assessment of knee joint coronal alignment. Knee 2020; 27(2): 543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.017

Paley D. What is alignment and malalignment. In: Thienpont E, editor. Improving accuracy in knee arthroplasty. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11661_1

Koo T K, Li M Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15(2): 155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Aunan E, Ostergaard D, Meland A, Dalheim K, Sandvik L. A simple method for accurate rotational positioning of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(6): 657-63. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1362733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1362733

Aunan E, Rohrl S M. No detrimental effect of ligament balancing on functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 129 mechanically aligned knees with 3 years’ follow-up. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(5): 548-54. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1485283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1485283

Saffarini M, Nover L, Tandogan R, Becker R, Moser L B, Hirschmann M T, et al. The original Akagi line is the most reliable: a systematic review of landmarks for rotational alignment of the tibial component in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27(4): 1018-27. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5131-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5131-z

Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski B J, Hrobjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64(1): 96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002

Kundel H L, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003; 228(2): 303-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2282011860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2282011860

Ueyama H, Minoda Y, Sugama R, Ohta Y, Yamamura K, Nakamura S, et al. Two-dimensional measurement misidentifies alignment outliers in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27(5): 1497-503. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5175-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5175-0

Yoshino K, Hagiwara S, Nakamura J, Tsukeoka T, Tsuneizumi Y, Ohtori S. Intra- and interobserver reliability and agreement in three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of component positions after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2019; 26(5): 1102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.07.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.07.001

Wakelin E A, Tran L, Twiggs J G, Theodore W, Roe J P, Solomon M I, et al. Accurate determination of post-operative 3D component positioning in total knee arthroplasty: the AURORA protocol. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13(1): 275. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0957-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0957-0

Toms A P, Rifai T, Whitehouse C, McNamara I. CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2022. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08483-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08483-8

Aunan E. Improving surgical techniques and functional outcome in total knee arthroplasty [Dissertation]. Oslo: Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, ISBN 978-82-8377-418-4; 2019.

Fang D M, Ritter M A, Davis K E. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 2009; 24(6 Suppl.): 39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.034

Kim Y H, Park J W, Kim J S, Park S D. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 2014; 38(2): 379-85. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2097-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2097-9

Parratte S, Pagnano M W, Trousdale R T, Berry D J. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92(12): 2143-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01398

Norwegian Arthroplasty Registry. Annual Report 2021; 2021. Available from: https://helse-bergen.no/nasjonal-kompetansetjeneste-for-led-dproteser-og-hoftebrudd/arsrapporter.