Is it okay to choose to receive bad news by telephone? An observational study on psychosocial consequences of diagnostic workup for lung cancer suspicion

Authors

  • Ingrid C. Andersen Department of Respiratory Medicine, Respiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Zealand University Hospital Naestved, Naestved, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Medicine, Naestved, Slagelse and Ringsted Hospitals, Næstved, Denmark
  • Volkert Siersma Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Kristoffer Marsaa Hospice Arresoedal, Frederiksvaerk, Denmark
  • Nikolaj Preisel Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Asbjørn Høegholm Department of Respiratory Medicine, Respiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Zealand University Hospital Naestved, Naestved, Denmark
  • John Brodersen Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Primary Health Care Research Unit, Region Zealand, Denmark
  • Uffe Bodtger Department of Respiratory Medicine, Respiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Zealand University Hospital Naestved, Naestved, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2022.2143280

Keywords:

Telecommunication, lung cancer, patient preference, diagnostic cancer workup

Abstract

Background

In-person meeting is considered the gold standard in current communication protocols regarding sensitive information, yet one size may not fit all, and patients increasingly demand or are offered disclosure of bad news by, e.g., telephone. It is unknown how patients’ active preference for communication modality affect psychosocial consequences of receiving potentially bad news.

Aim

To explore psychosocial consequences in patients, who themselves chose to have results of lung cancer workup delivered either in-person or by telephone compared with patients randomly assigned to either delivery in a recently published randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Methods

An observational study prospectively including patients referred for invasive workup for suspected lung cancer stratified in those declining (Patient’s Own Choice, POC group) and those participating in the RCT. On the day of invasive workup and five weeks later, patients completed a validated, nine-dimension, condition-specific questionnaire, Consequences of Screening in Lung Cancer (COS-LC). Primary outcome: difference in change in COS-LC dimensions between POC and RCT groups.

Results

In total, 151 patients were included in the POC group versus 255 in the RCT. Most (70%) in the POC group chose to have results by telephone. Baseline characteristics and diagnostic outcomes were comparable between POC and RCT groups, and in telephone and in-person subgroups too. We observed no statistically significant between-groups differences in any COS-LC score between POC and RCT groups, or between telephone and in-person subgroups in the POC group.

Conclusion

Continually informed patients’ choice between in-person or telephone disclosure of results of lung cancer workup is not associated with differences in psychosocial outcomes. The present article supports further use of a simple model for how to prepare the patient for potential bad news.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-12-02

How to Cite

Andersen, I. C., Siersma, V., Marsaa, K., Preisel, N., Høegholm, A., Brodersen, J., & Bodtger, U. (2022). Is it okay to choose to receive bad news by telephone? An observational study on psychosocial consequences of diagnostic workup for lung cancer suspicion. Acta Oncologica, 61(12), 1446–1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2022.2143280