Quantitative parameters of digital occlusal analysis in dental implant supported restorative reconstruction recent 5 years: a systematic review

Authors

  • Ting Zhou a Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Kunming Medical University, Yunnan, PR China; b Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Phatum Thani, Thailand
  • Bharat Mirchandani b Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Phatum Thani, Thailand
  • Xing-Xing Li c Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Kunming Medical University, Yunnan, PR China
  • Pichaya Mekcha b Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Phatum Thani, Thailand
  • Borvornwut Buranawat b Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Phatum Thani, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2022.2077980

Keywords:

Mastication, dental implant, occlusal force, digital occlusion, systematic review

Abstract

Objective

The aims of this systematic review were to evaluate the clinical masticatory performance of implant-supported restorations, observe the occlusal force changes in the distribution of the implant restoration and reveal the positive and negative contributing factors of implant design and components based on the outcomes of digital occlusal measurement.

Material and methods

An extensive search was conducted through PubMed and CENTRAL to identify clinical trials on implant-retained restorations using digital occlusal analysis methods. Two researchers assessed the identified studies and data extraction independently, and the data synthesis strategies without meta-analysis that summarizes the effect estimates were adopted.

Results

The search screened 3821 titles and abstracts, then full-text analysis for 26 articles was performed, and 14 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Four of six studies for implant-retained overdenture showed statistically significant improved bite force when immediate loading (p = .00045, .00005, .00055, and .00005, respectively), and no statistically significant results in the other two studies (p = .225, .371, respectively.) However, the results of the favoured intervention were not statistically significant (p = .104, .166, respectively) in two studies of single posterior implant restorations. In all three studies, the bite force distributed on the implant prostheses of partially fixed implant-retained restoration increased statistically significantly (p = .013, .001, .05, respectively).

Conclusions

The edentulous restoration supported by implants seems to significantly improves bite force and chewing efficiency compared with conventional dentures. Regular quantitative occlusal measurement is recommended to avoid the possible risk of overload. Smaller implants size and relatively small and flexible attachment designs may be more conducive to the stability and retention of the restoration of atrophy of alveolar bone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-02